AETC   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > AETC seeks enduring solutions for sexual misconduct
Story at a Glance
 Sexual assault is an egregious offense whenever and wherever it occurs. If it occurs in the armed forces, it betrays the trust that holds service members together in the defense of our nation." - Gen. Edward A. Rice Jr., commander, Air Education and Training Command
Related Stories
 AF leaders brief BMT sexual misconduct investigation findings - 11/15/2012
Related Links
 AETC Commander's Report to the Secretary of the Air Force
AETC seeks enduring solutions for sexual misconduct

Posted 11/14/2012   Updated 11/15/2012 Email story   Print story


by Maj. Carla Gleason
Air Education and Training Command Public Affairs

11/14/2012 - JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO-RANDOLPH, Texas -- The Air Force is undertaking sweeping changes to improve Air Force Basic Military Training safety and security at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland according to a report released today by Gen. Edward A. Rice Jr., Air and Education Training Command commander.

The changes are the result of Air Force-led investigations that began in 2011 which uncovered a high number of alleged sexual misconduct cases involving military training instructors and trainees - ranging from unprofessional social media contact of a sexual nature to sexual assault.

"The misconduct discovered at BMT tears at the foundational trust and core values that hold the Air Force together," Rice said. "We are fully committed to enduring solutions for the BMT environment and a zero-tolerance standard for sexual misconduct."
As an increasing number of allegations against MTIs came to light, AETC's leadership dedicated their efforts to investigate all of the allegations thoroughly, care for the victims, hold perpetrators accountable while protecting due process rights of those accused, and correct the problems that led to the misconduct.

Since April 2012, 53 investigators or agents and hundreds of support personnel have conducted interviews, analyzed data, and pursued leads. They completed thousands of hours of investigative work and will complete many more before they are finished. As a result, five military training instructors have been convicted by courts-martial and others are pending charges. All subjects are presumed innocent unless proven guilty.

"The vast majority of our MTIs have not engaged in criminal misconduct or demonstrated unprofessional behavior," said Rice. "Rather, they exemplify our Air Force core values. The number of MTIs being investigated constitutes a very small percentage of our MTI corps."

In addition to ongoing criminal investigations, the AETC commander appointed Maj. Gen. Margaret Woodward to conduct an independent, commander-directed investigation.

"The CDI was the next stage in AETC efforts to deeply and deliberately evaluate our training environments," said Rice.

The 38 CDI members conducted hundreds of interviews, surveyed more than 18,000 personnel, visited training locations, consulted with sister-service training schools, and conducted focus groups with basic trainees.

Woodward's team produced 22 findings categorized into five major areas: leadership; MTI selection and manning; MTI training and development; misconduct reporting and detection; and policy and guidance. The report also included 46 recommendations to improve those areas.

"It is important to remember ... honorable men and women throughout the Air Force continue to serve every day with distinction." Woodward said in her final report. "These dedicated Airmen build our Air Force one person at a time and remain proud of their mission and themselves. Their efforts continue to produce the world's greatest fighting force."

AETC intends to implement all or part of 45 of these recommendations. The single remaining recommendation, which suggests adjusting the length of BMT, is undergoing review in a separate forum.

Leadership: Five of the findings and 15 of the recommendations contained in Woodward's report dealt with leadership and oversight within BMT. According to the report, insufficient oversight contributed to a culture where incidents of misconduct developed.

"Fixing these problems will require leaders who foster and promote a professional culture by directly engaging with instructors and trainees every day," said Woodward. "In short, leaders must be an integral part of the training process from start to finish, building a climate of respect and discipline through action and example."

The command has already implemented several of the leadership recommendations including increasing leadership visibility and officer oversight.

Selection and Manning: The findings and associated recommendations for MTI selection and manning included decreasing the student to instructor ratio, increasing the number of female MTIs, adding additional leadership positions and providing formal guidance and requirements for the MTI screening and selection process.

"Because MTIs are particularly influential in imprinting our values on our youngest Airmen, and the workload associated with MTI duty is extremely high, candidates must be carefully screened," Woodward said. "In addition to experience in the operational Air Force, suitable applicants must meet a number of demanding requirements that indicate they are likely to succeed in this challenging special duty."

Training and Development: The existing instructor training program provides the foundation for the BMT MTI force, but the CDI investigation indicated areas where enhanced training and professional development would be beneficial. Recommendations in this area included a "back to basics" program that emphasizes Air Force core values and NCO professional standards of conduct, as well as specialized training for BMT leadership.

AETC will address these recommendations by emphasizing leadership as a core competency in the MTI qualification training course, by increasing the focus on mentorship and by developing a BMT deliberate development program, among other things.

Reporting, Detection and Climate: The CDI review identified an MTI culture that emphasized fear and power over trust and respect. Findings in this area also highlighted a lack of consistency in accountability, poor detection of misconduct and a lack of a formalized reporting process.

"For some MTIs, the power they hold over impressionable young men and women may tempt them to consider unprofessional conduct," said Rice during his review of the CDI report. "Our efforts are focused on deterring, detecting and preventing this behavior in the future, while strengthening BMT leadership and the MTI culture.

Recent command emphasis has been effective in this area according to surveys. Results indicated that 93 percent of trainees felt comfortable reporting misconduct and more than 95 percent believe leadership made reasonable efforts to stop sexual assault.

Policy and Guidance: During their investigation, the CDI team reviewed policy and guidance regarding prevention, detection, and handling of sexual assault, sexual harassment and unprofessional relationships in basic military training. Recommendations in this area included reducing barriers to reporting misconduct, greater situational awareness and fair, just, and equitable enforcement of instructions, policies, and guidance regarding unprofessional conduct.

In addition to recommendations outlined in the report, Rice directed the creation of a Military Training Oversight Council designed to provide enduring guidance to BMT leadership and advise the AETC commander on strategic issues affecting safety, good order and discipline and training.

"We owe it to our Air Force, our Airmen, and our nation to get this right," said Rice. "Ensuring that we do not find ourselves looking at these same problems again is a top priority."

11/20/2012 2:57:35 AM ET
Rank does not bring better leadership it weighs you down and stops free speech. Punishing cleans the slate but not the instituional concerns of the root cause. This was not an isolated czse.What does the USAR doe with 530000 active duty Are their results better or worse Where is the results from touring the other services Im not seeing any innovation.Is the way we train BMTs the culprit how do you yell and pressure young people and not expect some kind of trauma. Do we yell now and then say its ok Is SARC proven will BMTs even use it or does it not appeal to todays youth to call a government agency when you need help
Mark, New Mexico
Add a comment

 Inside AETC

ima cornerSearch

Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing  
Suicide Prevention    SAPR   IG   EEO   Accessibility/Section 508   No FEAR Act